Evangelism, the Left, and the Air Force Academy

Thursday, May 19, 2005

From time to time it seems as though there can be no meaningful discourse in American public life, particularly between those of diverse philosophies, faiths, or worldviews. It is easy to diagnose this as an inability of the Red States and Blue States to communicate, because red values and blue values are so drastically different. And there is some truth to that.

But perhaps more accurately, we are many red and blue islands, not necessarily geographic, but spiritual, economic, racial, and social. The islands have their own communications channels; their own books, magazines, and newspapers; their own churches, social gatherings, television shows, and political parties.

I’ve seen this kind of an island for many years in the evangelical Christian community. Having been raised in a Christian home, educated in a Christian college, and working much of my career in Christian organizations, I have met many, many believers who cannot identify one non-Christian friend. Or even a non-Christian acquaintance with whom they’ve had a meaningful conversation. In fact, many conservative Christians have never knowingly had a conversation with a homosexual person.

I confess all of this because I know that the flip side is also true—secular elites and many unchurched folks don’t have an evangelical friend or acquaintance. They’ve never met a authentic evangelical person. Most have never had a decent conversation with a serious Christian believer.

This all came to mind when I wrote a post on the criticism of Air Force Academy Christians. Seeing some of the visceral reaction on liberal blogs, I wondered who these bloggers were describing when they wrote about evangelical Christians.

The aggressive, take-no-prisoners evangelical zealots described in media coverage of the Air Force controversy bear no resemblance to 90 percent of the evangelicals I have met and played with, learned with, worked with, and worshipped with. I have been an evangelical Christian for 36 years. And since I have been working in what we call the evangelical cocoon, I have not been isolated from the trends and teachings of the evangelical community.

There are at least three things that we are taught within the evangelical cocoon about evangelism, or sharing your faith. (Never once have I ever heard it called prosyletizing by the church. It’s a word critics use to make it sound scary). First, in order to be obedient to instructions from Jesus Christ, we are taught, we must be a witness of our Christianity to others who are outside the faith. And it’s a joy—although most of us are uncomfortable with intruding on others’ personal privacy—because we believe we have the best news in the world.

Second, we are taught that individuals come to faith in Christ as a result of the moving of the Holy Spirit in them and it is our task only to present the good news with logic, emotion, anecdote, or personal reflection. We don’t bring anyone to faith in Christ. God does that.

Third, we learn that people who are turned off by us personally are not going to be receptive to what we are presenting. Converts at the edge of the sword are converts in name or number only. No one teaches us to badger seekers or use threats or intimidation. That’s a crazy evangelistic strategy.

Because the message of Jesus Christ is unwavering—“no one comes to the Father but by Me”—the Christian message is often characterized as arrogant. The message is clear and unchanging, but not boastful. When Christian believers are arrogant in their manner or words, they do damage to that faith. At those moments, they are an embarrassment to the Kingdom.
All that said, what is it that Americans for the Separation of Church and State, the New York Times and other MSM, and Yale Divinity School are talking about when they describe the activities of Christians at the Air Force Academy?

The NY Times describes what it sees at the Academy as “unconstitutional proselytizing of academy students by evangelists whose efforts were blessed by authority figures in the chain of command.” What is that? Is proselytizing unconstitutional? No, in fact it is unconstitutional to be” prohibiting the free exercise” of religion. Is it unconstitutional for the leaders of a military academy to bless the efforts of those who share their faith on campus? It would be only to the extent that it established one religion as the official religion of the academy or the military.

To avoid the appearance of the establishment of evangelical Christianity as the religion of the Academy there are legitimate lines that should not be crossed. No one should have their rights abridged because they are not adherents to a particular faith or if they have no faith at all.
But the free expression of faith, the open dialogue of all faiths, is not what is at stake here. My hunch is that Christian witnessing—Christians explaining the truths and benefits of trusting Jesus Christ—just grates on those who detest Christianity, or are repulsed by certainty.

The critics have mentioned several incidents:

Chaplains
In its analysis of the Academy’s actions, the Los Angeles Times quotes the Yale report: “During Protestant worship services, cadets were encouraged to proselytize to others and ‘remind them of the consequences of apostasy.’”

Wait. This is during the Protestant worship services! Is Yale suggesting that the administration of the Academy control the worship services? And look at their incendiary message: Go tell it on the mountain that Jesus Christ is Lord and that rejecting Him will have negative consequences.

We are in trouble as a nation if Christians cannot share that message everywhere and anywhere. The report continues: “Protestant Cadets were regularly encouraged to witness to fellow Basic Cadets.” Welcome to Evangelism 101. What a threat to the Republic. As I said earlier, this is what we are taught from our earliest days as Christians. Why did it become so shocking just because the men and women are wearing uniforms?

Passion of the Christ
The Times says there were flyers on dining hall chairs inviting cadets to view The Passion of the Christ. What strong arm tactics! How could these impressionable, vulnerable airmen resist such pressure?

Name Calling
Evidently, a Jewish cadet was called a “filthy Jew” by someone. That’s stupid and childish. But if it was an evangelical Christian, denigrating the Jewish people is totally out of line with the teachings of the church. There isn’t a faith group that has more respect for Jews and for Israel than evangelicals. Anyone who would take a little time to learn about evangelicals would know this. To include this in an analysis of the lines between church and state indicates the bias of the reporter.

Christians are not the persecuted minority in America and we shouldn’t act like it. But Christians are, interestingly, the constantly belittled and criticized majority.

When it comes to matters of faith, there is too much whining on the left and too much hand wringing on the right.

Frankly, if we—-as evangelicals—-took all of the opportunities presented to us each day to authentically and sensitively communicate our faith and our concern for others, the rapid expansion of the Christian community might scare the daylights out of those who think the armed forces that we rely on to defend our nation can’t possibly resist the spiritual entreaties of their colleagues.

--James Jewell

1 comments:

Anonymous said...

It's very late on a Saturday night, and I'm getting a bit bleary-brained. I hope my words aren't too jumbled. I also know that when it comes to a discussion of religion, I'm bound to inadvertantly offend someone. That's not my intention, and I apologize beforehand if I do.

I am Jewish, although not at all religious. Having to go to Hebrew school as a kid was so boring that it actually ended up driving me away from religion. I was also in the Air Force from 1977-1981, though I didn't have anything to do with the Air Force Academy. I can't say religion caused me any problems in the military, and many of the guys I worked with were happy when I'd work Christmas for them. Everyone got along pretty well, so it bothers me to see that religion may be hurting the cohesiveness that is so important to an effective military.

While I'm not a big fan of religion, I realize that it plays a big role in the psyche of the country. My view on evangelizing is pretty much that you're free to evangelize as long as I'm free to walk away. I get the sense that the problem at the AFA is that people are being preached to, but they have no way to walk away.

When I was in the military, there were a few Born-Again's I worked with, and occasionally they would warn me that if I didn't accept Jesus as my Savior, I'd have hell to pay in the next life. It was slightly annoying, in the same way that getting a call from a telemarketer is slightly annoying, but since these comments came from people who were my peers and near my own rank, I could just brush them off with a crack like - "That's ok - I'm happy worshiping Satan," and go back to whatever I was doing.

If I occasionally have a co-worker or stranger who knocks on my door try to convert me, I can politely say that I'm not interested. I just consider these episodes to be minor examples of life's little annoyances, but they don't happen often enough for me to be particularly concerned.

But if you have a supervisor prosyletizing at the AFA, you can't escape. If you try to walk away, or say "Sorry, not interested," you can be pretty sure that you'll be given an assignment to scrub the urinals on the weekend. (In fact, when I was in basic training, this was what we were told we would do if we decided not to go to religious services on Sunday morning.) You just have to stand there and put up with it. If you have a bunch of peers preaching, you can't escape because, if it's anything like the everyday military, you're put into a squadron with the same group of guys, and you live with them day in and day out. If it's institutionalized, you get the worst of both worlds. I doubt the people doing this think of it as threatening and coercive, but it definitely can be. If you don't agree, I would argue that it's only because you haven't been on the receiving end.

(Regarding the word prosyletize - I just realized that when evangelizing becomes annoying, I do start to call it prosyletizing.)

I appreciate James Jewell's observation that if you try to cram your religion down someone else's throat, it will only cause resentment. I agree. But whether it's only 5%, 10% or 50%, there are still too many Evangelicals who believe that in order to show they are good Christians, they either have to bash other religions, and/or if they can't convince people to voluntarily accept their views, they feel that it's ok to to take the next step and impose their views. This is why my opinion of Christianity (actually, religion in general) has been dropping over the last few years.

I realize that in other parts of the world, the majority religion often does the same thing, so it's not exclusive to Christianity. It's just that this is America, so Christianity is the religion of interest.

I did sense in his blog that James felt like what was going on at the AFA were just friendly discussions of religion. I imagine that in many situations this was true. But I also have to believe that in too many other instances, these were not friendly conversations, but rather good, old-fashioned fire-and-brimstone, Bible-thumping indoctrination, where one person talks and others were forced to listen with no way to escape.

Strangely enough, even though I was in the Air Force, and as a civilian spent some time at the Air Force Center for Studies and Analysis at the Pentagon, I actually know more graduates of the Naval Academy and West Point than I do graduates of the AFA. I was in a graduate school program where about a third of the students were from the military academies. Combining my own experience in the Air Force with my experiences with many junior-grade officers who were out of the military academies for only a few years leads me to easily believe that some AFA officers and cadets are overly gung-ho when it comes to forcing their religious views on others. Learning how to lead and persuade with subtlety comes with maturity and experience, and I rarely found this skill developed to much of an extent in young officers, much less cadets in the academies. Not all officers in the military are good. In fact, many, if not most, are either mediocre or just simply bad. Given their age and life experience, I can forgive the younger officers with the expectation that as they get older and more mature, they'll be less clumsy in how they lead. I have much less respect for the senior officers who never outgrew this stage, and are letting this kind of clumsy, ham-handed prosyletizing happen.

--If you're wondering, I'm a slighly left-leaning Independent who thinks that mixing government and religion is bad news. I think Bush is inept, although I did support going into Iraq due to some time I spent in Zimbabwe seeing for myself how one power-hungry dictator can single-handedly ruin a country.

 
 
 
 
Copyright © rooftop blog